Current and Upcoming

Francis Alÿs
Sven Augustijnen
Pierre Bismuth
Manon de Boer
Rineke Dijkstra
Mario Garcia Torres
Dominique Gonzalez-Foerster
Douglas Gordon
Joachim Koester
David Lamelas
Sharon Lockhart
Tino Sehgal
Philippe Thomas
Tris Vonna-Michell
Ian Wilson




Ian Wilson’s Time piece
by Jan Mot, 2008

BRUSSELS, 18 MARCH - As part of the recent exhibition Time Pieces at the gallery,

Ian Wilson showed a work with the title Time (spoken).1 This work has rarely been

exhibited and was somehow brought back into existence by Mathieu Copeland last fall

when he included it in the exhibition Performa with oral works at the Swiss Institute in

New York. This work can be described as an instruction piece and needs to be

realized by the gallery personnel. When a visitor asks what the contribution is of Ian

Wilson, they are instructed to reply: ‘it is the word time spoken’, or ‘c’est le mot temps

parlé’ etc. The work is rooted in the first period of his oral works, i.e. in the year 1968.

By then Wilson had stopped producing paintings and sculptures and had turned to

language as his medium. In the course of the years he would develop a complex set

of spoken works, ranging from informal conversations to organized discussions in

galleries and museums. In his attempt to take distance from the valuable art object, he

refused to have his discussions being recorded or photographed.2


In 1968 Wilson would try to insert the word ‘time’ into his conversations with people in

all kinds of situations. To Anne Rorimer he described his Time work from that period

as follows: ‘I would be at a gallery opening and someone would ask me: ‘so what are

you doing these days?’ I would reply, ‘I am interested in the word time.’ Later,

someone would ask: ‘But how can time be your art?’ And I might have replied: ‘As it is

spoken, “time”’ Another day, someone might have asked, having heard I was using

‘time’ as my art: ‘So what are you working with these days’ and I would reply: ‘“time” I

am interested in the idea’.... I like the word when it is spoken: ‘time’. And so the word

was used over and over again.’ 3


The work Time (spoken) as shown in the gallery is however dated in 1983. In that

year Wilson participated in a group exhibition which was organized by Michel Claura

in an abandoned church in Paris.4 Wilson didn’t travel to Paris on this occasion but

instructed the people at the reception desk to do his work when visitors asked about it.

This work became the first oral work by Wilson that is not realized or spoken by the

artist himself and doesn’t imply his physical presence. In fact anyone can bring the

work into existence, and whether the person is saying ‘time’ with the intention of doing

Wilson’s work or not, is not of any importance to the artist. The work keeps on existing

in time as an oral work and in this way distinguishes itself from the Discussions which

are realized by the artist (and his public) and take place at a certain time and a certain



Between 1968 and 1983 Wilson made other works that didn’t imply his active, oral

participation. There are for instance two works described by Wilson as ‘statements’

which take the form of a typed sentence on a sheet of paper and signed by the artist.

The texts of these statements are ‘There is a discussion’ and ‘There was a

discussion’, both works dating from 1981. There are also works in the form of a

catalogue contribution, sometimes limited to the insertion of his name in the list of

participating artists. And in 1983 Wilson also started to publish his Sections, a series

of small books relating to the subject matter of the discussions.

In 1968 when Wilson decided to stop creating physical objects, he excluded the idea

that the work Time could take a printable form. But by 1983 he had been working for

more than 10 years with formalized Discussions and the use of certificates

documenting them. This practice made the way clear for the work Time (Spoken) and

the diffusion of it through a written instruction.


For the next show at the gallery three early paintings by Ian Wilson that were

destroyed or lost have been reconstructed.



1 Other artists in the show were: Pierre Bismuth, Mario Garcia Torres, Dominique

Gonzalez-Foerster, Will Holder, David Lamelas and Jonathan Monk.

2 Wilson had recorded some early Discussions but later he destroyed the tapes

and the transcripts.

3 Anne Rorimer, New Art in the 60s and 70s. Redefining Reality’, Thames &

Hudson, London, 2001, p. 91

The title of the show was ‘Pierre et Marie. Exposition en travaux’. The church was

located at 36, rue d’Ulm in Paris.



Source: Gallery Newspaper 61, March 2008